Skip to main content
Skip to course navigation
Return to course: Lean Six Sigma – Green Belt Programme
Previous Lesson
Previous
Next
Next Section
Quiz 3 – Statistical Analysis
A Green Belt tests whether a process defect proportion differs from a specified historical value. Which type of hypothesis test is most directly appropriate?
*
Proportion test
Mean test
Regression analysis
Measurement System Analysis
In hypothesis testing, what is the correct decision when the p-value is less than or equal to the chosen significance level α?
*
Reject the null hypothesis
Fail to reject the null hypothesis
Accept the null hypothesis as proven
Increase the significance level until the result changes
A Green Belt compares the average cycle time from Machine A with the average cycle time from Machine B using independent samples. Which analysis is most directly suited to this comparison?
*
Two-sample mean test
One-sample proportion test
Chi-square goodness-of-fit test
Scatter diagram
A study compares the defect proportions of Shift A and Shift B. Shift A has a defect rate of 4% and Shift B has a defect rate of 7%. Which type of test is appropriate for evaluating whether the proportions differ?
*
One-sample mean test
Two-sample proportion test
Paired mean test
Simple linear regression
A scatter diagram shows that as machine temperature increases, the number of defects generally decreases. What does this visual pattern indicate?
*
A possible negative relationship
A proven causal relationship
A guaranteed statistically significant relationship
No relationship between the variables
The Pearson correlation coefficient between two numerical variables is r = −0.90. What does this value indicate?
*
A strong negative linear association
A strong positive linear association
No linear association
A perfect causal relationship
A regression model is Ŷ = 50 + 2X. What is the interpretation of the slope?
*
Y equals 50 whenever X increases by one unit
Each one-unit increase in X is associated with an estimated two-unit increase in Y
Each two-unit increase in X causes Y to decrease by one unit
The model explains 2% of the variation in Y
A regression model has R² = 0.64. Which interpretation is most appropriate?
*
About 64% of the observed variation in Y is explained by the fitted model
The model proves that X causes 64% of Y
The correlation must equal 0.64 in every regression context
The model predicts every future observation with 64% accuracy
A Green Belt finds a strong correlation between two process variables. Which conclusion is scientifically appropriate?
*
The first variable is proven to be the root cause
The variables are associated, but causation still requires further investigation
The second variable must be the root cause
The correlation makes process knowledge unnecessary
A regression analysis shows a statistically significant slope, but the practical effect is very small. What should the Green Belt do?
*
Consider statistical significance together with practical significance and process context
Declare the variable a critical root cause solely because p < α
Ignore the statistical result completely
Treat the regression equation as proof of causation